AIRI DISCOVERY & PRIORITISATION
You’ve Measured Your AI Readiness. Now What?
The AIRI Decision Engine takes your organisation from scores to action — identifying, evaluating, and ranking your top AI projects in a single 40-minute workshop.
85–87% of AI projects fail — not because the technology doesn’t work, but because organisations pick the wrong projects, underestimate change management, or lack data readiness. The Decision Engine exists to fix that.
Data Driven Not Ego
The 3-Step Pipeline
The Decision Engine replaces subjective debates with a single transparent formula that weights what actually matters in AI project success:
Discover
Gut feel
2×2 matrix
Score & Decide
5-pillar scoring
AIRI DE formula
Prioritise
Strategic judgement
Dot voting
Step 1 – Discovery Matrix
Start With Discovery
Before scoring anything, teams brainstorm real pain points and place project ideas on a simple 2×2 Impact × Feasibility matrix. This is a 1-minute gut-feel exercise — no rubrics, no arithmetic.
Before scoring anything, teams brainstorm real pain points and place project ideas on a simple 2×2 Impact × Feasibility matrix. This is a 1-minute gut-feel exercise — no rubrics, no arithmetic.
Selection rule: Pick 2 from Do This. If fewer than 2, pull from Moonshot first, Quick Win second. Never from Drop.
Impact x Feasibility MatriX

Step 2 – The AIRI Decision Engine
One Formula, Five Pillars, Complete Clarity.
The Decision Engine replaces subjective debates with a single transparent formula that weights what actually matters in AI project success:
AIRI DECISION ENGINE SCORE
[(0.7×P4 + 0.3×P5) + P3 + 2×P1] × P2 Ethics Gate
2X
P1 · Leadership & Culture
Leadership, talent, and change capacity. Double-weighted because people are what make or break AI projects.
1X
P3 · Business Value
Strength of the business case. Important, but a great business case without org readiness still fails.
0.7 + 0.3
P4 · Data + P5 · Infra
Data dominates infrastructure. You can spin up cloud compute; you can’t conjure clean data.
Gate
P2 · Ethics & Governance
Not a score to optimise — a gate. No governance? Full stop. The formula multiplies by zero.
The Ethics Gate
Ethics Is Not Optional. It Is A Multiplier.
P2 doesn’t add to the score — it multiplies the entire result. An organisation with no ethics framework gets zero, regardless of how strong everything else is.
STOP
P2 at L0 (AI Unaware). No governance framework. Do not proceed. Build the ethics foundation first.
CONDITIONS
P2 at L1 (AI Aware). Basic awareness but no formal framework. Proceed with an ethics remediation plan. Score is halved.
GO
P2 at L2+ (AI Ready or above). Adequate governance and risk framework in place. Full score applies.
See It In Action
Worked Example
A mid-sized company evaluates deploying an AI chatbot to handle tier-1 customer queries.

Calculations
Feasibility: (0.7 × 2.50) + (0.3 × 3.75) = 2.875
+ Business Value: 2.875 + 3.75 = 6.625
+ 2× Leadership & Culture: 6.625 + (2 x 2.50) = 11.625
x Ethics Gate: 11.625 × 1 = 11.625
AIRI Decision Engine Score = 11.6 / 20 = 58%
A moderate candidate. Proceed with caution on weak pillars. P4 (Data Readiness at L2) is the bottleneck — improving data access would push the score significantly higher.
Reading the Score
What The AIRI Decision Engine Tells You
The theoretical maximum is 20. Here’s how to interpret where a project lands:
0
Ethics-killed
<25%
Very low
Drop.
25-50%
Weak
Significant gaps.
50-75%
Moderate
Go! But watch out for weak pillars.
75-100%
Strong
High confidence! Prioritise and resource.
“It’s not a rejection, it’s a roadmap.”
Step 3 – Strategic Judgment
AIRI Design Engine Prioritise. The Team Decides What To Champion.
After the top 3 – 5 projects are scored and presented, every participant votes silently across three strategic lenses. No discussion, no lobbying — just stickers on worksheets mounted on the wall.
This is deliberate. The Decision Engine removes politics from evaluation. The dot vote adds back strategic intent — what leadership actually wants to invest in, knowing the readiness data.
Rules: 2 stickers per round per person. Both stickers on one project = OK (signals conviction). No tallying between rounds — anchoring on the leader biases subsequent votes. Count everything at the end.
Three Voting Rounds
IMPACT
Would this transform our organisation in 3 years?
READINESS
Can we start meaningful progress within 90 days?
COLLABORATION
Would other organisations also benefit from this?
Tiebreakers: Highest Impact count → Highest DE Score → 3-minute discussion + show of hands.
Ready to find your top 3 AI projects?
Download the complete workshop materials — runbook, A1 worksheets, and facilitator scripts — and join the AIR Framework Community!
